ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 5:  Guy Auger - FRA

Ranking Index = 4.13
 SNAC 2020, Bex - LSGB, 6th - 13th September
Judges nation High value
Panel average Low value
 Sportsman, Programme 4: 2nd Unknown
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Emiliano Del Buono 7.5 8.5 8.5 8.0 8.5 7.5 8.5 8.5 8.0 9.0 8.0 0 1540.1 1
  Bu 131 HB-URF 7.22 8.44 8.48 7.86 8.55 7.21 8.19 8.23 7.95 8.75 7.72   1521.2    
2 Céline Duruz 8.0 PZ 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.0 7.0 1 1422.7 3 -1
  Votec 322 HB-YLC 7.72 5.28 6.90 7.16 7.86 7.82 7.63 7.72 8.48 7.63 6.71   1413.4    
3 Alexander Tamagni 7.5 6.0 8.0 8.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 0 Lo 1336.0 5 -2
  Pitts 12 N75WU 7.22 5.35 7.95 7.96 7.16 7.82 6.63 6.71 5.85 7.63 5.70   1407.1    
4 David Perriard 8.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 8.5 8.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 8.0 0 1442.9 2 +2
  Extra 200 HB-MSW 8.23 6.59 6.90 6.46 7.16 8.44 7.63 7.22 7.95 8.19 7.72   1447.2    
5 Christophe Theubet 8.0 8.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 8.0 8.5 8.0 7.0 0 1403.4 4 +1
  Extra 200 HB-MTD 7.72 8.44 7.95 6.46 6.46 7.21 6.51 7.72 8.48 7.63 6.71   1407.3    
6 Guillaume Favre-Bulle 7.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 3.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 0 1311.9 6
  Extra 200 HB-MSW 6.71 8.44 7.95 7.16 6.46 6.59 7.63 2.65 7.43 7.63 7.72   1311.2    
7 Eliott Johnson 8.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 7.5 7.0 HZ 7.5 8.0 8.0 7.0 0 1268.4 7
  CAP 10C HB-SAX 7.72 7.21 7.95 7.86 7.16 6.59 HZ 7.22 7.95 7.63 6.71   1263.6    
    0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1   6
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

Judge   O/all       

28 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 PZ to Mark 1 2  
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - 2  
 Hi to Mark - 1  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 5 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Ch.Judge Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge x2
Céline Duruz Fig-2 5.5 Hi 7.5 5.0 Lo PZ Lo PZ OK
Votec 322 HB-YLC   5.63 5.28 4.93 5.28 5.28  
 
Score anomalies     Ch.Judge   Judge 2   Judge 3   Judge 4   Judge 5
Alexander Tamagni   1438.4 1430.7 1458.6 1403.7 Lo 1336.0
Pitts 12 N75WU   1407.1
 
 Review of Judge Style and RI Items
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.69, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.48 Panel average mark = 7.42, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.70
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
this pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI elements ranked
  by decreasing size
Alexander Tamagni Pitts 12 1345.1 Lo  1426.3 - 81.3 5 3 - 2 2.26 54.7%
David Perriard Extra 200 1446.3 -   1418.1 + 28.2 2 4 + 2 0.79 19.1%
Céline Duruz Votec 322 1427.2 -   1475.6 - 48.4 3 2 - 1 0.65 15.8%
Christophe Theubet Extra 200 1408.9 -   1378.9 + 30.0 4 5 + 1 0.43 10.4%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score		   Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		  
Emiliano Del Buono - H/C Bu 131 1538.4   1484.5 + 53.9 1 1        
Guillaume Favre-Bulle Extra 200 1322.3   1356.2 - 33.9 6 6        
Eliott Johnson CAP 10C 1281.1   1229.5 + 51.6 7 7        
 
 Total RI Contribution per Nation
Judge:

max nation bias = 0.00

 min = 0.00

o/all average = 0.00
Panel:

= 0.00

 min = -1.23  
 
Most favoured Least favoured Average 1 x H/C

Ranking Index totals per nation
using the +/- rank differences to show
national bias from the most to the
least favoured teams of Pilots

The number of Pilots in each nation
is shown with the nationality
 
Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 4.4 Build: 01.09.20