ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 5:  Guy Auger - FRA

Ranking Index = 11.24
 SNAC 2020, Bex - LSGB, 6th - 13th September
Judges nation High value
Panel average Low value
 Sportsman, Programme 3: 1st Unknown
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Emiliano Del Buono 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 7.5 8.5 9.0 8.5 10.0 0 1357.6 1
  Bu 131 HB-URF 9.15 7.74 7.66 8.21 7.76 8.04 7.28 8.17 9.15 8.24 9.47   1322.0    
2 Guillaume Favre-Bulle 8.5 6.0 8.0 7.5 6.0 7.5 8.0 7.0 8.0 7.5 6.5 0 1144.4 3 -1
  Extra 200 HB-MSW 8.28 6.00 7.66 7.31 5.96 7.28 8.04 6.87 7.42 7.09 6.44   1142.6    
3 Christophe Theubet 8.0 7.0 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.5 7.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0 1196.4 2 +1
  Extra 200 HB-MTD 7.42 6.87 7.66 7.31 6.86 7.28 7.28 6.87 7.42 7.66 7.74   1184.8    
4 David Perriard 7.5 HZ 7.5 5.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 7.5 5.0 1 929.9 6 -2
  Extra 200 HB-MSW 6.55 5.84 7.09 5.06 6.86 6.51 8.04 7.74 8.28 7.09 5.14   1084.2    
5 Céline Duruz 8.5 6.0 9.0 PZ 7.5 8.0 8.0 7.0 8.5 8.0 8.5 2 1135.5 4 +1
  Votec 322 HB-YLC 8.28 6.00 8.81 CHZ 7.31 8.04 8.04 CHZ 8.28 7.66 8.17   1014.4    
6 Eliott Johnson 8.0 6.5 8.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 6.5 1 1125.0 5 +1
  CAP 10C HB-SAX 7.42 CHZ 7.66 5.96 6.86 6.51 7.28 6.87 7.42 7.66 6.44   974.1    
7 Alexander Tamagni 8.0 7.0 7.0 HZ 7.5 7.0 HZ HZ 8.0 7.0 7.0 0 789.3 7
  Pitts 12 N75WU 7.42 6.87 6.57 HZ 7.31 6.51 HZ HZ 7.42 6.52 6.87   821.2    
    0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0   6
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

Judge   O/all       

23 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ 2 10  
 PZ to CHZ 1 1  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 PZ to Mark - 1  
 HZ to Mark 1 3  
 Lo to Mark - 1  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 5 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Ch.Judge Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge x2
Céline Duruz Fig-4 HZ 6.5 HZ HZ PZ CHZ
Votec 322 HB-YLC   HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ  
Céline Duruz Fig-8 HZ 8.0 7.0 HZ 7.0 CHZ
Votec 322 HB-YLC   HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ  
David Perriard Fig-2 6.0 6.5 HZ 4.0 HZ OK
Extra 200 HB-MSW   5.63 6.42 5.84 5.46 5.84  
Eliott Johnson Fig-2 7.5 6.0 HZ 6.0 6.5 CHZ
CAP 10C HB-SAX   HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Review of Judge Style and RI Items
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.59, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.40 Panel average mark = 7.34, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.57
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
this pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI elements ranked
  by decreasing size
David Perriard Extra 200 936.2 -   1093.1 - 156.8 6 4 - 2 5.69 50.7%
Eliott Johnson CAP 10C 1103.4 -   981.8 + 121.6 5 6 + 1 2.46 21.9%
Céline Duruz Votec 322 1112.3 -   1006.3 + 106.0 4 5 + 1 2.09 18.6%
Guillaume Favre-Bulle Extra 200 1119.9 -   1172.7 - 52.8 3 2 - 1 0.89 7.9%
Christophe Theubet Extra 200 1164.5 -   1170.8 - 6.3 2 3 + 1 0.11 1.0%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score		   Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		  
Emiliano Del Buono - H/C Bu 131 1302.6   1307.7 - 5.1 1 1        
Alexander Tamagni Pitts 12 815.8   822.3 - 6.5 7 7        
 
 Total RI Contribution per Nation
Judge:

max nation bias = 0.00

 min = 0.00

o/all average = 0.00
Panel:

= 0.00

 min = -1.14  
 
Most favoured Least favoured Average 1 x H/C

Ranking Index totals per nation
using the +/- rank differences to show
national bias from the most to the
least favoured teams of Pilots

The number of Pilots in each nation
is shown with the nationality
 
Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 4.4 Build: 01.09.20