ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 4:  Bernard Courtois - FRA

Ranking Index = 12.42
 SNAC 2020, Bex - LSGB, 6th - 13th September
Judges nation High value
Panel average Low value
 Sportsman, Programme 2: Free
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Emiliano Del Buono 8.0 8.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 7.5 9.0 8.0 8.0 0 1261.1 1
  Bu 131 HB-URF 8.11 8.25 5.54 7.52 7.52 7.54 9.05 8.89 8.18   1265.1    
2 Christophe Theubet Lo 0.0 6.0 7.5 6.0 6.5 6.5 7.5 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 1 1027.1 5 -3
  Extra 200 HB-MTD 7.27 5.83 7.54 6.68 6.94 6.86 7.86 7.46 6.45 6.29 6.45   1183.0    
3 David Perriard 7.5 7.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 7.5 7.5 7.0 4.0 6.0 0 1167.6 3
  Extra 200 HB-MSW 7.86 8.18 5.83 7.59 7.07 5.83 8.24 8.24 7.32 5.12 6.45   1171.7    
4 Eliott Johnson 7.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 0 Hi 1249.4 2 +2
  CAP 10C HB-SAX 7.52 8.11 6.97 7.59 6.94 6.86 7.46 7.46 8.18 7.59 7.32   1177.8    
5 Céline Duruz 6.5 7.5 7.0 HZ 6.5 7.0 6.5 7.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 0 1116.4 4 +1
  Votec 322 HB-YLC 6.86 7.86 7.59 HZ 6.40 7.46 7.07 7.46 9.05 6.97 7.32   1119.3    
6 Guillaume Favre-Bulle 6.0 7.0 6.0 HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ 7.5 0 489.9 6
  Extra 200 HB-MSW 6.20 6.97 6.68 HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ 7.75   483.4    
7 Alexander Tamagni 7.5 HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ 6.5 0 263.6 7
  Pitts 12 N75WU 7.86 HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ 6.88   253.7    
    1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1   6
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

Judge   O/all       

18 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - 4  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - 1  
 AV to Mark - 2    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark - 1  
 Lo to Mark 1 2  
 Hi to Mark - 1  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 4 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Ch.Judge Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge x2
Christophe Theubet Fig-1 7.5 6.5 8.0 Lo 0.0 Lo 0.0 OK
Extra 200 HB-MTD   7.52 6.68 7.62 7.27 7.27  
 
Score anomalies     Ch.Judge   Judge 2   Judge 3   Judge 4   Judge 5
Eliott Johnson   1127.7 1206.6 1114.9 Hi 1249.4 1190.7
CAP 10C HB-SAX   1177.8
 
 Review of Judge Style and RI Items
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 6.92, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.59 Panel average mark = 7.27, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.64
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
this pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI elements ranked
  by decreasing size
Christophe Theubet Extra 200 1045.7 -   1214.6 - 168.9 5 2 - 3 8.28 66.6%
Eliott Johnson CAP 10C 1273.3 Hi  1165.1 + 108.2 2 4 + 2 3.68 29.7%
Céline Duruz Votec 322 1137.1 -   1111.2 + 25.9 4 5 + 1 0.46 3.7%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score		   Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		  
Emiliano Del Buono - H/C Bu 131 1285.3   1253.0 + 32.2 1 1        
David Perriard Extra 200 1189.5   1202.9 - 13.3 3 3        
Guillaume Favre-Bulle Extra 200 495.5   492.0 + 3.5 6 6        
Alexander Tamagni Pitts 12 263.8   251.3 + 12.4 7 7        
 
 Total RI Contribution per Nation
Judge:

max nation bias = 0.00

 min = 0.00

o/all average = 0.00
Panel:

= 0.00

 min = -13.37  
 
Most favoured Least favoured Average 1 x H/C

Ranking Index totals per nation
using the +/- rank differences to show
national bias from the most to the
least favoured teams of Pilots

The number of Pilots in each nation
is shown with the nationality
 
Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 4.4 Build: 01.09.20